<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>STAC on ringsaturn</title><link>https://blog.ringsaturn.me/en/tags/stac/</link><description>Recent content in STAC on ringsaturn</description><generator>Hugo -- 0.166.0</generator><language>en</language><copyright>ringsaturn</copyright><lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0900</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://blog.ringsaturn.me/en/tags/stac/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Multi-Source Weather Analysis with LLMs</title><link>https://blog.ringsaturn.me/en/posts/multi-weather-source-llm-analysis/?utm_medium=rss</link><pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0900</pubDate><guid>https://blog.ringsaturn.me/en/posts/multi-weather-source-llm-analysis/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Picking up where I left off: &lt;a href="https://blog.ringsaturn.me/posts/sitian/"&gt;earlier this year I built a project called sitian&lt;/a&gt;,&#10;which analyzes weather processes from a sequence of synoptic charts over a period of time.&#10;Using it myself and backtesting it against historical weather, I found that combined analysis across multiple data sources did not work well.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;Take one example: a region is about to be affected by a typhoon, and the relevant data includes:&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;ul&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;Radiosonde soundings around the typhoon&amp;rsquo;s track&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;Model forecast data&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;Satellite observations&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;Radar data&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;Surface observations as supporting context&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;/ul&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;The previous setup made it awkward to handle fairly complex combinations of input data.&#10;It also meant maintaining and integrating several data sources.&#10;So the sitian project has, in practice, stopped running.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>